Mkt Web 360 — Agencia de Marketing Digital
Content Marketing

How to write content that doesn't sound like AI: techniques to humanise your copy

Using AI to write is not the problem. Publishing the output unedited is. Content that 'sounds like AI' is recognisable from miles away — and neither Google nor your customers respond to it the same way as a text with genuine judgement, voice and perspective.

How to write content that doesn't sound like AI

AI-generated content without editing has recognisable patterns: grandiose opening sentences, predictable structures, absence of real opinion and a uniformly neutral tone that never commits to anything. It is correct. It is boring. And it does not convert.

Why unedited AI content does not work

AI-sounding content has two fundamental problems. The first is perception: readers — especially B2B decision-makers — detect the lack of real perspective and associate it with a lack of expertise. If an agency publishes generic articles that could be from any agency in the world, it communicates exactly that: it has nothing original to say.

The second problem is SEO performance. Google does not penalise AI per se, but it does penalise low quality. Content that adds nothing new, has no original data, takes no position and does not address specific search intent is exactly the type of content that algorithm updates progressively filter out.

Does your content have brand voice or sound generic?

At Mkt Web 360 we create editorial content that combines SEO rigour with a real business perspective. Nothing generic, nothing filler.

View content marketing service

The patterns that give AI content away

Identifying unedited AI content is easy once you know what to look for. Opening phrases like 'in today's world' or 'in the digital age we live in'. Closings like 'in conclusion, we can affirm that'. Transitions like 'it is important to highlight' or 'it is worth mentioning'. Lists of five points where all carry equal weight and none offer genuine perspective.

Concrete techniques for humanising the output

The first technique is the simplest: add an opinion. Not a 'this depends on the case' — a real position. 'We believe most SMEs should not be on TikTok' is more useful and more memorable than 'TikTok can be a good option depending on your audience and sector'. Opinion differentiates, builds authority and is memorable.

The second technique is using your own data or real data with context. 'In our experience with local service clients in Spain, the average time to the first significant organic result is 4-6 months' is infinitely more valuable than 'SEO takes between 3 and 12 months to show results' — which is what any AI will generate.

The third technique is introducing non-standard structure. Instead of the classic 'introduction - 5 points - conclusion', start with a specific problem, develop the contrast between what people believe and what actually happens, and end with an actionable recommendation.

Nuevo servicio

Auditoría GEO gratuita

Analizamos cómo aparece tu marca en ChatGPT, Perplexity y Gemini y te decimos qué oportunidades estás perdiendo.

Solicitar auditoría gratuita

The role of the human editor in the AI process

The right way to use AI in content creation is as a first-draft generator, not an autonomous publisher. The human editor adds: the business-specific perspective, your own or verified data, brand voice, real examples and judgement about what is relevant to your specific audience.

Content that converts, not content that fills space

If you want a content strategy that combines SEO, real business perspective and authentic brand voice, we can design it together.

Frequently asked questions about AI content

Can Google detect if a text was written by AI?
Google has stated it does not penalise AI-generated content simply for being AI-generated, but for being low quality or lacking real value. However, AI detectors exist and generic, predictable content does correlate with lower search performance. The key is quality, not origin.
Is it bad to use AI to write marketing texts?
Not at all — it is a tool. The problem arises when it is used without human editing, without your own perspective and without adapting the output to your brand's real voice. AI can dramatically accelerate writing, but editorial judgement, opinion and authenticity remain human.
What signals indicate a text sounds like AI?
Phrases like 'in today's world', 'it is essential to keep in mind', 'in conclusion we can say', bullet lists without real hierarchy, absence of concrete examples, uniformly neutral tone, and structures that always seem to follow the same pattern. AI text tends to be correct but generic.
What tools do you recommend for humanising AI content?
The human process is the best tool: reading aloud to detect what sounds artificial, adding your own examples or data, using your brand's voice, and cutting everything that is unnecessary. Tools like Hemingway Editor help with readability, but nothing replaces editorial judgement.